2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Renault Kangoo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Renault Kangoo would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (64 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Renault Kangoo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 391 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Kangoo. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Kangoo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2003 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Ram | Kangoo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Body Type | Pickup | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1783 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 21.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2630 mm |