2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Isuzu Rodeo would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (500 HP) has 250 more horse power than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (250 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 682 kg more than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (712 Nm) has 378 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo. (334 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Isuzu Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Dodge | Isuzu |
Model | Ram | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 712 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 19.6 L/100km | 10.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 26.1 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 74 L |