2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (201 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda Tribute. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 244 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | Tribute |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 346 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2010 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 62 L |