2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (216 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Dodge | Rover |
Model | Ram | 75 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |