2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, both 2006 Dodge Ram and 2006 Holden Commodore were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 105 more horse power than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Ram | Commodore |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5700 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |