2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, both 2006 Dodge Ram and 2006 Mitsubishi Colt were released in the same year (2006). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 254 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ram | Colt |
Year Released | 2006 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 95 L |