2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 6,208 cc, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 423 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Dodge Ram. (408 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ram | CLS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4703 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 408 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 80 L |