2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS
To start off, 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 552 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (712 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS. (630 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2008 Mercedes-Benz CLS | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Ram | CLS |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8276 cc | 6208 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 500 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 712 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 102.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 94.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2472 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 23.5 L/100km | 12 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 80 L |