2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1358 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 404 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Ram | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 50 L |