2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2009 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2009 Mercury Sable is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,881 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2009 Mercury Sable. (263 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2009 Mercury Sable.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 489 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mercury Sable. (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2009 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Ram | Sable |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5881 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 2900 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 827 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 78 L |