2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2006 Dodge Ram. (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Dodge Charger. (569 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Dodge Charger.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Ram | Charger |
Year Released | 2006 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5881 cc | 6100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 425 HP |
Engine RPM | 2900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 827 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1466 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3048 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 72 L |