2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2011 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2011 Fisker Karma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fisker Karma weights approximately 20 kg more than 2006 Dodge Ram.
Because 2006 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Fisker Karma. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Dodge Ram | 2011 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Dodge | Fisker |
| Model | Ram | Karma |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 235 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2520 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 36 L |
