2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2013 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2013 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 5,881 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2013 Suzuki Kizashi. (180 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2013 Suzuki Kizashi.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 597 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Suzuki Kizashi. (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Suzuki Kizashi.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2013 Suzuki Kizashi | |
Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
Model | Ram | Kizashi |
Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5881 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 2900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 827 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6300 mm | 4651 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1481 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 63 L |