2006 Dodge Viper vs. 1999 Holden Maloo
To start off, 2006 Dodge Viper is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Holden Maloo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Holden Maloo would be higher. At 8,274 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Holden Maloo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Viper (725 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Holden Maloo. (542 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Holden Maloo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Viper | 1999 Holden Maloo | |
Make | Dodge | Holden |
Model | Viper | Maloo |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8274 cc | 5699 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 725 Nm | 542 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |