2006 Dodge Viper vs. 2012 Lancia Musa
To start off, 2012 Lancia Musa is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Dodge Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Dodge Viper would be higher. At 8,274 cc (10 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Viper (510 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 421 more horse power than 2012 Lancia Musa. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2012 Lancia Musa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Viper weights approximately 245 kg more than 2012 Lancia Musa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Lancia Musa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Viper (725 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 525 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Lancia Musa. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Lancia Musa. 2012 Lancia Musa has automatic transmission and 2006 Dodge Viper has manual transmission. 2006 Dodge Viper will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Lancia Musa will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Viper | 2012 Lancia Musa | |
Make | Dodge | Lancia |
Model | Viper | Musa |
Year Released | 2006 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8274 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 510 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 725 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Top Speed | 306 km/hour | 173 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 3.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1523 kg | 1278 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 47 L |