2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 510 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Croma (280 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Croma | Cedric |
Year Released | 2006 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 280 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2540 mm |