2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (152 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 185 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Croma | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 5766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |