2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (145 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 85 kg more than 1968 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Croma (203 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2006 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Croma | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1998 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 114 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
