2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1973 Honda 145
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Honda 145. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Honda 145 would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1973 Honda 145. (68 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1973 Honda 145.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Honda 145, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 1973 Honda 145 has manual transmission. 1973 Honda 145 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1973 Honda 145 | |
Make | Fiat | Honda |
Model | Croma | 145 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1433 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 68 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1500 mm |