2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,909 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 641 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Because 1979 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Croma | Celica |
Year Released | 2006 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2510 mm |