2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Fiat | Oldsmobile |
Model | Croma | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |