2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 815 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Fiat | Zastava |
Model | Croma | 102 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2160 mm |