2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1982 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Alto.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Suzuki Alto, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 1982 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Fiat | Suzuki |
| Model | Croma | Alto |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 796 cc |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 38 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
