2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1991 Mazda MX-3
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 42 more horse power than 1991 Mazda MX-3. (88 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1991 Mazda MX-3.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mazda MX-3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1991 Mazda MX-3 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Croma | MX-3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1991 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 88 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |