2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1993 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1993 Renault Clio. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1993 Renault Clio.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1993 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Croma | Clio |
Year Released | 2006 | 1993 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1390 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 72 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |