2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1994 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,978 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (145 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 140 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 1994 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 1994 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 1994 Ford Aerostar | |
| Make | Fiat | Ford |
| Model | Croma | Aerostar |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2978 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 133 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1515 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3030 mm |
