2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1994 Mitsubishi Magna
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi Magna. (114 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Mitsubishi Magna, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 1994 Mitsubishi Magna has manual transmission. 1994 Mitsubishi Magna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1994 Mitsubishi Magna | |
Make | Fiat | Mitsubishi |
Model | Croma | Magna |
Year Released | 2006 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2555 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 114 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1780 mm |