2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1997 Ford Windstar
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Ford Windstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Ford Windstar would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Ford Windstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Ford Windstar (150 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford Windstar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1997 Ford Windstar | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Croma | Windstar |
Year Released | 2006 | 1997 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 3000 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1920 mm |