2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1998 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura CL (150 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (118 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Croma weights approximately 15 kg more than 1998 Acura CL.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1998 Acura CL has automatic transmission and 2006 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2006 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1998 Acura CL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1998 Acura CL | |
Make | Fiat | Acura |
Model | Croma | CL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1909 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 150 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4826 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2715 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 65 L |