2006 Fiat Croma vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Acura CL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Acura CL would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (150 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 1999 Acura CL | |
Make | Fiat | Acura |
Model | Croma | CL |
Year Released | 2006 | 1999 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2300 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 150 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1781 mm |