2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2000 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (202 HP) has 57 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile SS should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile SS (318 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile SS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma. 2000 Oldsmobile SS has automatic transmission and 2006 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2006 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Oldsmobile SS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 2000 Oldsmobile SS | |
| Make | Fiat | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Croma | SS |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 3791 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 202 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 318 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5130 mm |
