2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 2,489 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Mark II (276 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (130 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Croma | Mark II |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 2489 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 276 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |