2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2001 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Ford Econovan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Ford Econovan would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2001 Ford Econovan. (96 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2001 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 2001 Ford Econovan has manual transmission. 2001 Ford Econovan will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 2001 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Croma | Econovan |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1996 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 96 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1640 mm |