2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2002 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 6,000 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Lincoln Continental (410 HP) has 265 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Lincoln Continental (571 Nm) has 368 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2002 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma. 2002 Lincoln Continental has automatic transmission and 2006 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2006 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Lincoln Continental will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 2002 Lincoln Continental | |
| Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
| Model | Croma | Continental |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 6000 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 410 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 571 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1510 mm |
