2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2003 Hyundai Matrix
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Hyundai Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Hyundai Matrix would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2003 Hyundai Matrix. (104 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2003 Hyundai Matrix.
Because 2006 Fiat Croma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Fiat Croma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Hyundai Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 2003 Hyundai Matrix has manual transmission. 2003 Hyundai Matrix will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 2003 Hyundai Matrix | |
| Make | Fiat | Hyundai |
| Model | Croma | Matrix |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1798 cc | 1606 cc |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 104 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1750 mm |
