2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2003 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,798 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (130 HP) has 60 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 2003 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Fiat | MCC |
Model | Croma | Crossblade |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 1798 cc | 598 cc |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 70 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1630 mm |