2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 405 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma. 2004 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 2006 Fiat Croma has manual transmission. 2006 Fiat Croma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 2004 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
| Model | Croma | CTS |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2597 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 179 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 79.6 mm |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2950 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 999.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 68 L |
