2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 131 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda Tribute (266 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Croma | Tribute |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2966 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 80 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 999.9 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 62 L |