2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2004 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Armada (305 HP) has 160 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Armada weights approximately 899 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Croma | 2004 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Croma | Armada |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2197 cc | 5556 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 305 HP |
| Torque | 203 Nm | 522 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 98.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 92 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 2274 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 5260 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3140 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 999.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 106 L |
