2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2005 Suzuki XL7
To start off, 2006 Fiat Croma is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki XL7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki XL7 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki XL7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (185 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Croma. (145 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki XL7 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki XL7 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki XL7 (250 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Croma. (203 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki XL7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 2005 Suzuki XL7 | |
Make | Fiat | Suzuki |
Model | Croma | XL7 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 2736 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 185 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 250 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1670 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 999.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 64 L |