2006 Fiat Croma vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Fiat Croma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Fiat Croma would be higher. At 2,197 cc, 2006 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Croma (145 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (108 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 2009 Kia Cee'd. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 24 kg more than 2006 Fiat Croma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Croma (203 Nm) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Kia Cee'd. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Croma | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Fiat | Kia |
Model | Croma | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2197 cc | 1396 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 77.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 74.5 mm |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1375 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 999.9 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 53 L |