2006 Fiat Doblo vs. 2000 Opel Omega
To start off, 2006 Fiat Doblo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Opel Omega would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Opel Omega (305 HP) has 243 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Doblo. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Doblo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Opel Omega weights approximately 14 kg more than 2006 Fiat Doblo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Opel Omega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Opel Omega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Doblo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Opel Omega (450 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Doblo. (118 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Doblo | 2000 Opel Omega | |
Make | Fiat | Opel |
Model | Doblo | Omega |
Year Released | 2006 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 118 Nm | 450 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1296 kg | 1310 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 52 L |