2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Palio II is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 89 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 1955 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1955 Riley RM A | |
Make | Fiat | Riley |
Model | Palio II | RM A |
Year Released | 2006 | 1955 |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 1236 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2870 mm |