2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1958 Jeep CJ
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1958 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Jeep CJ (135 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 1958 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Fiat Palio II. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1958 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1958 Jeep CJ (326 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1958 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Palio II | 1958 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | Fiat | Jeep |
| Model | Palio II | CJ |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1242 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 326 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 3520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2060 mm |
