2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1959 Holden FE
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Holden FE. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Holden FE would be higher. At 2,166 cc (6 cylinders), 1959 Holden FE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1959 Holden FE. (60 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1959 Holden FE.
Because 1959 Holden FE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Holden FE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Holden FE (150 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1959 Holden FE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1959 Holden FE | |
Make | Fiat | Holden |
Model | Palio II | FE |
Year Released | 2006 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 2166 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 1200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2670 mm |