2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Palio II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (64 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 415 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Palio II (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley Kestrel. (96 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Palio II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Fiat | Riley |
Model | Palio II | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2006 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 25 L |