2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (72 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Palio II (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (94 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Palio II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
Make | Fiat | Opel |
Model | Palio II | Ascona |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1242 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 72 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 103 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70.8 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 73.4 mm |
Top Speed | 164 km/hour | 150 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3830 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 70 L |