2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 1,697 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Fiat Palio II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 503 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Fiat Palio II | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Palio II | 9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.2 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 20.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.9 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 38 L |