2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (129 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (68 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 375 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (180 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (135 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Fiat Palio II | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
| Make | Fiat | Fiat |
| Model | Palio II | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1697 cc | 1995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 20.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1325 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2460 mm |
