2006 Fiat Palio II vs. 1983 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Fiat Palio II (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (70 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II should accelerate faster than 1983 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Palio II weights approximately 591 kg more than 1983 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Palio II (140 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Mercury Lynx. (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Fiat Palio II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Mercury Lynx.

Compare all specifications:

2006 Fiat Palio II 1983 Mercury Lynx
Make Fiat Mercury
Model Palio II Lynx
Year Released 2006 1983
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1580 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 100 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 140 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86.4 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 67.4 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 8.8:1
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1545 kg 954 kg
Vehicle Length 3830 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1640 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2380 mm 2400 mm